Friday, June 6, 2008

Foreign and Military Policy

As the results of the attacks of the World Trade Center were taken place, military and foreign policy may have been viewed quite differently from before. A result to this was Bush’s immediate answer of going into war. During his presidency he forced to make a decision, he chose to enter in to war. Along with this declaration of war which congress did not actually do, it was the president who declared war. The power to declare war from congress has slowly deteriorated due to the increase influence and power the president has. Anyway, foreign and military policy has been shaping for the past 2 terms Bush has been in office. As his presidency starts to wind down, people begin to see our foreign and military policy as a weakening strength of the U.S. As more and more troops die in Iraq and Afghanistan many people’s view of the war has gone down. People are beginning to want a change with the policy. Due to the increase of price on oil, gas prices has sky rocketed as a result of the war.
My stance on all of this is that we need to fix our foreign and military policy yes. And that starts off with sending our troops home. Our veterans need there rest, they have been working tirelessly. I know some may disagree with me but in order to improve our foreign and military policy we need to strengthen first our domestic policy. We need to organize and fix the problems here before we go trying to police the world by bring democracy to the world. As an Obama supporter, we need to have trust in that Iraq will continue to do well without us breathing down there necks. They will bring democracy by letting them establish it on their own. Though in the increase of patriotism here at our nation, we need to be able to let other countries become more independent, without our help constantly. The power of the president has increased for the past years; I believe congress should begin to take more action in the foreign and military policy.
Other ways our society has changed due to the focus of the war in our nation is the amount of hate against terrorism. People are in constant fear now. With the “random” screening tests in airports, security has toughened. In my opinion, America is only working on fear itself. We are in constant fear of something to happen so we always have be the first one to strike so we don’t get the surprise.
As our nation needs an improvement on foreign policy so does the president change within the next year. With the end of the primary season, we have two presidential candidates hoping to better our foreign and military policy from both ends of the spectrum. We can only sit and wait as we vote on the next president in hopes in reducing the fear, the gas prices, and warlike activity. Here is a political cartoon I found online that I found it quite important.


http://themoderatevoice.com/category/entertainment/cartoons/
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/922

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Iowa's Upside

The results of the Iowa caucus on the democratic side had proven a huge change in the running for the democratic nominee. Obama’s 9 percent differential had proven his push to be the best candidate. Although this may have set up for the idea that this run was going to be one-sided after a crucial win for Obama with Hillary falling back as third, or dead last compared among the main contenders. The article I read states that
“One thing is likely after the caucus. The field wills still be wide open
for the Feb. 5 primaries” (LA Times).
Many polls have shown entering the New Hampshire Primary that Obama was still going have that 10 pt lead over Hillary. As a result, the polls were proven wrong as Clinton wins with a 2 percent differential over Obama. This portrays that there is still an open field for the battle for the best candidate on the democratic side. Obama’s win in Iowa caused Hillary to tackle this race on a different approach and surprisingly she found herself on top. In my opinion this battle is far from over. As Hillary captivates the blue collar voters, and Obama sways the young-ones, either candidate needs to dig deeper in order to pull an edge over the other. In the upcoming primary at South Carolina, it will be interesting to see how each front runner candidates tackle this state by accentuating their advantages or by even going further. For example, Obama hopes to captivate the African-American vote being the under-dog as many are still wooed by Bill Clinton influencing their vote. I think Obama in long run will have the edge needed to become the Democratic Nominee because his drawing of the younger vote will soon help to his advantage because his domino effect will influence first comers to vote in his favor. Through this overall battle Iowa, some say is irrelevant, in fact it is because of how it starts off this whole process. We are ensured for a battle royal in the nearing caucuses and primaries.

Works Cited: LA Times Jan 6 , 2008 Sunday Edition